> I believe that text such as this would make the I-D much easier to > follow. As it stands, you have to read between the lines and speculate. Tom,
Thank you for the comments. Do you have a specific change in mind, or could your propose text, that would address this? Thanks, Lou On 9/13/2017 12:42 PM, t.petch wrote: > I think that in one respect, perhaps the key respect, this I-D fails to > state the obvious (or at least what is likely obvious to those who have > been at this for a while:-). > > The problem that is hinted at but never explicitly stated is that data > objects can appear both as configuration and as state, e.g. when learned > by other means or at other times. The original model of datastores > required these data objects to be modelled twice, as configuration false > and as configuration true, and since there could be many of them, and > the rules of YANG require them to be in separate trees, this led to a > twin-trees approach such as can be seen in RFC7277 or RFC7223. > > Amongst other problems, this separation of operational state from > configuration in a > separate branch in the data model has been found to be operationally > complicated and impacts the readability of module > definitions. The relationship between > the branches is not machine readable and filter expressions operating > on configuration and on related operational state are different. > > With revised datastores, there is a single data object to model both > values but this now appears in two datastores, one for the > configuration value, one for the operational state value. > > Instead of two YANG data nodes there is one data node in two datastores, > a more elegant and simpler solution to the problem. > > > I believe that text such as this would make the I-D much easier to > follow. As it stands, you have to read between the lines and speculate. > > Tom Petch > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lou Berger" <lber...@labn.net> > To: "netmod WG" <netmod@ietf.org> > Cc: <netmod-cha...@ietf.org>; > <draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datasto...@ietf.org> > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 10:02 PM > >> All, >> >> This starts a two week working group last call on >> draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-04. >> >> The working group last call ends on September 17. >> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. >> >> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and >> believe it is ready for publication", are welcome! >> This is useful and important, even from authors. >> >> Thank you, >> Netmod Chairs >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
