Hello, The latest draft does not contain an appendix with the deprecated state tree (to support the non-NMDA model as specified in RFC6087bis section 4.23.3), so if it is published in this way, there is an issue at the level of BBF TR-383.
Note that the draft-ietfnetmod-rfc7223bis does include the deprecated container interfaces-state. Best regards, Bart Bogaert -----Original Message----- From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 6:36 PM To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org> Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-entity-05 All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-entity-05. The working group last call ends on December 13. Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list. Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome! This is useful and important, even from authors. Thank you, Netmod Chairs _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
