On 12/08/2017 03:08 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 07:08:32AM -0500, Lou Berger wrote:
On 12/08/2017 06:15 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
In talking to some others on this topic, they suggested using a library per
datastore. I haven't look into this enough to know if that is a good or bad
idea, but it seems functionally equivalent to your first option but realized
in a different way. Just something to add to the mix.
If people want to put additional options on the table, they should
work out the details and write down a tree diagram and send the result
to the list.
I guess we have a different philosophical approach here.  I'd prefer to
hear about fresh ideas, even if half baked or asked as a "stupid
question". Sometimes, if not dismissed out of hand, these lead to
something that is a better result than others that have been immersed in
the issue have thought of.

The devil is usally in the details and 'using a library per datastore'
is for my taste a bit too little to understand what is actually being
proposed. I am not dismissing proposals, but I like to be able to
understand what is being proposed. And for that I need a proposal that
is a bit more than 'using a library per datastore'.
I agree.  In this case, I can't understand how it would work at all.
The library is config false, so a client can never get it via
get-config from <running>.  Maybe the proposal is a new operation
<get-yang-library> with the datastore as a parameter?  Or maybe the
idea is to somehow return meta data together with <get-config>?  I can
guess, and dismiss the proposal based on my guesses ;-)  Or someone
can write up a concrete proposal.
I just posted a followup on a relevant proposal in a thread "[netmod] [Netconf] Alternative YANG library structure for 7895bis".

Vladimir

/martin

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to