On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 14:14 -0500, Lou Berger wrote: > > On 1/17/2018 11:57 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > Ok. I'm ok with keeping the inline case as it is. However, I think > > > > > > > > I don't agree. The metadata annotation solves real issues. > > > > > > One issue with the annotation is that since the schema might be > > > different in different datastores, it means that the client needs to > > > read the annotation in all datastores, and then fetch the schemas. So > > > it is a bit more difficult to work with for a client. > > > > But it doesn't mean that the schemas*must* be different, and it is easy to > > figure out when they are the same. Also, modules sets in YLbis can further > > help > > avoid redundant parsing of the same modules. > > > > Lada > > > > So I think this amplifies that the difference is one of optimization. > Given the maturity of this work and the state of the dependent work, > some of which is already with IESG for publication - I don't see how or > why we should be discussing anything more than fixing flaws in this > document.
I beg to differ. Lada > > Lou > -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
