Hi Robert, The Introduction section has : " Furthermore, the operational state datastore may support non-configurable YANG modules in addition to the YANG modules supported by conventional configuration datastores. " I infer that in the new Yang-library structure, the schema for "conventional" data-stores should not include the non-configurable YANG module. Is my inference correct ?
With Regards, Rohit R Ranade From: Robert Wilton [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com] Sent: 29 May 2018 15:28 To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrran...@huawei.com>; netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query Hi Rohit, On 29/05/2018 10:35, Rohit R Ranade wrote: Hi All, Consider the below YANG tree, which contains both "rw" and "ro" nodes. module: ietf-interfaces +--rw interfaces | +--rw interface* [name] | +--rw name string | +--rw description? string | +--rw type identityref | +--rw enabled? boolean | +--rw link-up-down-trap-enable? enumeration {if-mib}? | +--ro admin-status enumeration {if-mib}? | +--ro oper-status enumeration | +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time | +--ro if-index int32 {if-mib}? | +--ro phys-address? yang:phys-address | +--ro higher-layer-if* interface-ref >From what I understand, in the new yang-library structure the schema for ><operational> data-store will have the complete YANG tree. The schema for ><running> will need to add deviations with "not-supported" for all the "ro" >nodes for this module ? No need for the deviations for <running>. <running> only contains the "config true" parts of the schema. So, for a normal, NMDA compliant server, the same schema can be used for all datastores. Thanks, Rob With Regards, Rohit R Ranade _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
