The phrase 'will be defined' is not good. Anyway, for a notification nested in data tree, the data tree must exist in <operational> and the context in which XPath expressions are evaluated is <operational>, see section 6.1. of RFC 8342.
/js On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 09:38:05AM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > Hi Juergen, > > Modules which define only notifications(ietf-netconf-notifications) will be > defined in <operational> data-store ONLY. Right ? > > With Regards, > Rohit R Ranade > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] > Sent: 30 May 2018 12:28 > To: Rohit R Ranade <rohitrran...@huawei.com> > Cc: Robert Wilton <rwil...@cisco.com>; netmod@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netconf-rfc7895bis-06 deviation query > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 06:40:02AM +0000, Rohit R Ranade wrote: > > > A module having only "ro" nodes , can be considered to be implemented > > in any data-store ? operational/ephemeral etc > > No. > > > A module having "rw" nodes, what is the rules for it to be considered > > implemented in a data-store ? > > You implement the set of nodes that the datastore supports. In case of a > config false module and a conventional configuration datastore, this set is > empty. > > > RFC 7950 is quite clear for the rules for when a module is considered > > implemented. Please clarify implementation with respect to data-store also. > > I do not understand why this is unclear. > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
