This confirms the completion of this period. I think we can conclude the following:
The Question of whether better guidance for usage can be applied was raised and discussed. Robert Wilton proposed some text which seems both reasonable and which does not change the substance of the draft. The Question of where tags reside was raised, it appears resolved. From the meeting, there remains the request for the addition of an example. Kent - can we add an example Chris - what format would you like it in. Kent: xml/netconf or json/restconf is fine, just identify which is used. On this basis I think we can do a writeup and forward a draft 04 to the IESG for review / IETF last call. Thanks Joel > On Nov 12, 2018, at 08:46, joel jaeggli <joe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > During the Thursday nov 8 session of netmod, we asked if there were any > objections to the publication of the Draft-03 version of > draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags which addresses comments and concerns raised > during the WGLC. In the meeting there were none. This commences a comment > period to confirm that call. As this follows closely on the heels of the IETF > 103 meeting we’ll let the call run through Monday the 26th of November. > > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags-03.txt > > > Thanks > Joel > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
