Hi Juergen,
YANG library currently defines the type "revision-identifer". Is this a
typedef that should logically migrate to rfc6991bis?
Thanks,
Rob
On 14/11/2018 08:16, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 09:10 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
Alex Campbell <alex.campb...@aviatnet.com> wrote:
Does a percentage really need a single standard type in the first
place? How about "units percent;"?
At this point, after hearing about how different modules have
differing requirement on this type, I tend to agree.
+1
Or even "units %;"
Lada
/martin
________________________________________
From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)
<a...@cisco.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 5:03 a.m.
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder; Balázs Lengyel
Cc: NETMOD WG
Subject: Re: [netmod] for a future rfc6991bis
On 11/13/18, 9:07 AM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
<netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 01:33:01PM +0000, Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In some cases I want a percentage without fractions. This could be
> defined
> using range, by specifying the numbers 0 | 1 | 2 ... 99 | 100 in the
> range's
> argument.
>
> typedef percent-short {
> type percent { range 0 | 1 | 2 ... 99 | 100; } // didn't type
out
> all the 101 integer values :-)
> }
>
I guess we need to settle on a small number of percentage types that
people find useful and then module authors hopefully find what they
need. I am not sure that listing 101 numbers is a good pattern to use
(although it does achieve what you want). For percentages that have no
fraction, you likely want to derive from a base type that is efficient
to encode for binary encodings such as CBOR.
Or simply define a type with a base type of unit8 type and a range of
0-100.
Acee
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
