Balázs Lengyel <balazs.leng...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hello, > > In a similar manner we found multiple uses for the > ietf-netconf-acm:node-instance-identifier. We > imported nacm just to reuse this type. > Anyone else interested?
Yes, this is a useful type that is not just NACM-specific. We also use in various places. /martin > > regards Balazs > > On 2018. 11. 29. 12:03, Robert Wilton wrote: > > Hi Juergen, > > YANG library currently defines the type "revision-identifer". Is this a > typedef that should > logically migrate to rfc6991bis? > > Thanks, > Rob > > On 14/11/2018 08:16, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 09:10 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Hi, > > Alex Campbell <alex.campb...@aviatnet.com> wrote: > > Does a percentage really need a single standard type in the first > place? How about "units percent;"? > > At this point, after hearing about how different modules have > differing requirement on this type, I tend to agree. > > +1 > > Or even "units %;" > > Lada > > /martin > > ________________________________________ > From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee) > <a...@cisco.com> > Sent: Wednesday, 14 November 2018 5:03 a.m. > To: Juergen Schoenwaelder; Balázs Lengyel > Cc: NETMOD WG > Subject: Re: [netmod] for a future rfc6991bis > > On 11/13/18, 9:07 AM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder" > <netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 01:33:01PM +0000, Balázs Lengyel wrote: > > Hello, > > > > In some cases I want a percentage without fractions. This could be > > defined > > using range, by specifying the numbers 0 | 1 | 2 ... 99 | 100 in the > > range's > > argument. > > > > typedef percent-short { > > type percent { range 0 | 1 | 2 ... 99 | 100; } // didn't type > out > > all the 101 integer values :-) > > } > > > > I guess we need to settle on a small number of percentage types that > people find useful and then module authors hopefully find what they > need. I am not sure that listing 101 numbers is a good pattern to use > (although it does achieve what you want). For percentages that have no > fraction, you likely want to derive from a base type that is efficient > to encode for binary encodings such as CBOR. > > Or simply define a type with a base type of unit8 type and a range of > 0-100. > > Acee > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd. > Senior Specialist > Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: balazs.leng...@ericsson.com _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod