On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 02:46:40PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > If you go back ~20 messages, my proposal was ip-address-prefix, > > ipv4-address-prefix, and ipv6-address-prefix. > > Do we agree that this type really specifies two values in one? If so > I think the "and" is useful. > > Also note that the current text in RFC 6991 says: > > The ipv4-prefix type represents an IPv4 address prefix. > > so having a type ipv4-address-prefix for something that is not (only) an > "ipv4 address prefix" is imo confusing.
I can fix the wording. But I can also use ip*-address-and-prefix if people think this a better name. Perhaps I should do both, fix the wording (at other places the text just says "ip prefix") and use ip*-address-and-prefix for the new types. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
