On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 04:55:02PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Juergen, > > I must admit that I think this is the worst possible outcome. Independent of > the original intent, at a high level it is just not a good idea to accept the > non-canonical prefix format and return the canonical format. >
So you propose to deprecate the definitions and create new ones? Otherwise, I can't follow why a clarification can be the worst possible outcome. Note that we do have different lexical representations this in several other places. We accept +17 to mean 17 (Section 9.1 of RFC 7950.) /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
