Hi, "Ivory, William" <william.iv...@intl.att.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a must statement that causes a compilation error on a Cisco NCS > device (admittedly ancient (NCS version 3.4.4), but can't update it), as > follows: > > must "(../../packets * current()) <= (../../interval * 1000)"; > > Error is 'error: XPath syntax error: 40: unknown operator current' > > However, our internal XPATH compiler thinks this is valid, and if I change > the order in the must statement to the following, the NCS is happy: > > must "(current() * ../../packets) <= (../../interval * 1000)"; > > Can anyone confirm if there is a genuine error in the original must > statement, or is it valid XPATH?
The XPath expression is legal. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
