Thanks for confirming. William
On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 12:42 +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Hi, "Ivory, William" <william.iv...@intl.att.com<mailto:william.iv...@intl.att.com>> wrote: Hi, I've got a must statement that causes a compilation error on a Cisco NCS device (admittedly ancient (NCS version 3.4.4), but can't update it), as follows: must "(../../packets * current()) <= (../../interval * 1000)"; Error is 'error: XPath syntax error: 40: unknown operator current' However, our internal XPATH compiler thinks this is valid, and if I change the order in the must statement to the following, the NCS is happy: must "(current() * ../../packets) <= (../../interval * 1000)"; Can anyone confirm if there is a genuine error in the original must statement, or is it valid XPATH? The XPath expression is legal. /martin
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
