[Roman: for this draft, the takeaway is that Qin’s section deviates from the template because the module doesn’t define all the parts typically found in a YANG module]
Hi Rob, > [RW] > Perhaps add such as section in [], and mark it to be removed before > publication. > > E.g. [RFC Editor: Please remove this comment before publication. For > reviewers: This section has been modified from the standard template because > …] Yes, this idea was coming to me as I was writing the above, but I thought it useful still to agree that the RFCs should never be published with a reference to the template, whether or not the Security Considerations section conforms to it or not. > I’m obviously not saying that we need to do this for this document, just as a > suggestion for future documents. Agreed. > > Regards, > Rob Kent // as chair and shepherd
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
