"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Andy
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 3:02 PM Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote: > Authors, > > Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption call > on the "yang-node-tags” draft. In preparation for that, we’ve determined > both that the draft has changed significantly and that there is a new > author, and therefore feel it necessary to issue another IPR call, as > follows: > > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of preparation for WG Adoption: > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > > We note that all DT members are listed as contributors. If you > contributed to the document please respond. Alternatively, please feel > free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and > would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to > acknowledgments after WG adoption). > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > stage until a response has been received from each author. > > NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above > and > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > Thank you, > NETMOD WG Chairs > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > response. > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod