Another correction, not all authors responded. We’re still pending a response from Liang.
Thanks, Kent > On Dec 7, 2020, at 5:39 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote: > > Correction. > > Some authors replied: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”. > > While others replied: > > "No, I'm not aware of any non-disclosed IPR that applies to this draft." > > K. > > >> On Dec 7, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net >> <mailto:kent+i...@watsen.net>> wrote: >> >> Thank you, authors. >> >> All authors responded with "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to >> this draft”. >> >> Kent (as co-chair) >> >> >> >>> On Nov 23, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net >>> <mailto:kent+i...@watsen.net>> wrote: >>> >>> Authors, >>> >>> Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption call on >>> the "yang-node-tags” draft. In preparation for that, we’ve determined both >>> that the draft has changed significantly and that there is a new author, >>> and therefore feel it necessary to issue another IPR call, as follows: >>> >>> >>> Authors, Contributors, WG, >>> >>> As part of preparation for WG Adoption: >>> >>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? >>> >>> Please state either: >>> >>> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >>> or >>> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" >>> >>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >>> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? >>> >>> If yes to the above, please state either: >>> >>> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >>> or >>> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" >>> >>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think >>> appropriate. >>> >>> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors. If you >>> contributed to the document please respond. Alternatively, please feel >>> free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and >>> would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to >>> acknowledgments after WG adoption). >>> >>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >>> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >>> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >>> stage until a response has been received from each author. >>> >>> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. >>> >>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed >>> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under >>> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are >>> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from >>> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your >>> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above >>> and >>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty >>> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty>. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> NETMOD WG Chairs >>> >>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >>> response. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
