Juergen, Yes, I agree that is a better phrasing.
Thanks for suggesting it. Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> > Sent: 09 July 2021 12:50 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwil...@cisco.com> > Cc: Balázs Lengyel <balazs.leng...@ericsson.com>; Andy Bierman > <a...@yumaworks.com>; netmod@ietf.org; Benoit Claise > <benoit.cla...@huawei.com> > Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 09:10:34AM +0000, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > > > > "YANG modules that are only required to satisfy import-only dependencies > MAY be excluded from the leaf-list. If they are excluded then the consumer > of the instance data file can choose any versions of the YANG modules that > satisfy the import dependency." > > > > Sorry, this wording is a bit wrong or possibly misleading. I assume > your intention was this: > > OLD: > > If they are excluded then the consumer of the instance data file can > choose any versions of the YANG modules that satisfy the import > dependency. > > NEW: > > If they are excluded then the consumer of the instance data file has > to apply the YANG language rules to resolve the imports. > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
