On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 04:34:41PM +0000, tom petch wrote:
>
> <tp>
> The definition of 'identifier' in RFC7950 is not the same as the definition
> of 'identifier' in RFC6020 and rfc7991-bis quotes the latter and not the
> former. I am not clear what the best way forward is.
>
It helps me and likely also others if we can nail things down and be
explicit. Are you talking about:
RFC 6020:
;; An identifier MUST NOT start with (('X'|'x') ('M'|'m') ('L'|'l'))
identifier = (ALPHA / "_")
*(ALPHA / DIGIT / "_" / "-" / ".")
RFC 7991:
identifier = (ALPHA / "_")
*(ALPHA / DIGIT / "_" / "-" / ".")
The yang-identifier defined in draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-09.txt
did not change and it still references RFC 6020. What exactly is your
concern or proposal? Do you propose to change the definition of
yang-identifier to reference RFC 7950 and to drop the second pattern
(which would be an allowed change according to YANG update rules)? Or
do you propose to add a new definition of a yang-identifier-1.1?
/js
--
Jürgen Schönwälder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
