Authors/All, One of the authors pointed out that the list of contributors was incomplete, and specifically didn't include all listed in the paragraph of the contributors section. We had mistakenly read this paragraph as Acknowledgments versus Contributors. It does appear that some of those listed may be Contributors, i.e., materially contributed to the technical solution or the text (excluding editorial changes), while others may in fact belong in an Acknowledgement section. Given this, we'd like to ask the authors to refactor the Contributors section into separate Acknowledgement and Contributor sections before moving forward on this document. Once we have the new version, we can then judge if there are any missing IPR statements.
Thank you, Kent and Lou > On Jan 16, 2023, at 5:59 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote: > > [NOTE: A response is needed from all listed in this message's "To" line, the > authors and contributors listed in the draft] > > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > In preparation for a WGLC Call: > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor > please answer the above by responding to this email regardless > of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This > document will not advance to the next stage until a response > has been received from each author. > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not > listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations > under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF > if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to > refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related > to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs > listed above and > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > Thank you, > Kent and Lou > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > response. > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
