Hello chairs and WG, (as an author)
We've updated both drafts to refactor Acknowledgements vs Contributors: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/09/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver/11/ The IPR call for Module Versioning is complete. It already included all authors + contributors. For YANG Semver, we're missing IPR declarations from the following people (we didn't include them in the original IPR call): Bo Wu lana.w...@huawei.com Jan Lindblad jlind...@cisco.com Rgds, Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Kent Watsen > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 7:35 PM > To: netmod@ietf.org > Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [netmod] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-09 > > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking > links or > opening attachments. See http://nok.it/ext for additional information. > > > > Authors/All, > > One of the authors pointed out that the list of contributors was incomplete, > and > specifically didn't include all listed in the paragraph of the contributors > section. > We had mistakenly read this paragraph as Acknowledgments versus > Contributors. It does appear that some of those listed may be Contributors, > i.e., > materially contributed to the technical solution or the text (excluding > editorial > changes), while others may in fact belong in an Acknowledgement section. > Given this, we'd like to ask the authors to refactor the Contributors section > into > separate Acknowledgement and Contributor sections before moving forward on > this document. Once we have the new version, we can then judge if there are > any missing IPR statements. > > Thank you, > > Kent and Lou > > > > On Jan 16, 2023, at 5:59 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote: > > > > [NOTE: A response is needed from all listed in this message's "To" line, the > authors and contributors listed in the draft] > > > > > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > > > In preparation for a WGLC Call: > > > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > > > Please state either: > > > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > > or > > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > > or > > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > > appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor > > please answer the above by responding to this email regardless > > of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This > > document will not advance to the next stage until a response > > has been received from each author. > > > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not > > listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations > > under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF > > if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to > > refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related > > to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs > > listed above and > > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > > > Thank you, > > Kent and Lou > > > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > > response. > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
