Hi Kent, I am a bit struggling about how to reply to this poll …
I think that having some guidelines about how to deal with unknown bits when reporting information received from a protocol is quite useful. In other words, the I-D is addressing an issue that needs to be resolved However, as pointed out in your PS, there has been a lot of discussion on the mailing list and I fully agree with the concerns raised during that discussion as well as raised by some people opposing the adoption of this I-D against the NBC aspects of the solution proposed in the I-D. In other words, I do not support the solution described in the I-D My 2 cents Italo From: Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> Sent: giovedì 3 agosto 2023 11:03 To: netmod@ietf.org Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits-02 NETMOD WG, This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-haas-netmod-unknown-bits/02 There is no known IPR on this draft (IPR call<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/zJPEgqyi9yXzRqPO6NPJklQsBcU/>). Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day (any time zone) Aug 17. PS: I was hoping that Jeff would update the draft to reflect comments received on-list (e.g., here<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/8vk2TU2yaT8kLc1N7sbxiVs27UY/>) before starting this poll, but he is going on PTO shortly and wouldn’t be able to get to it for awhile, though he’s happy to do so upon returning. Thank you, Kent (as Co-chair)
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
