Versioning people told me that the version numbers follows from the kind of changes made. If true, then discussing the version number first is backwards.
/js On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:59:45AM +0000, Jason Sterne (Nokia) wrote: > Hi Jurgen, > > We need this poll to set fundamental direction in the WG. Yes, there will > still be discussion & debate around *either* option once we select one. But > we need to agree on whether we're moving ahead by updating YANG 1.0/YANG 1.1 > (without requiring any sort of new YANG version number) or if we as a WG are > going to insist on only allowing this work to continue and exist in YANG > modules marked with a new YANG version 1.2. > > We need to put this part of the decision behind us and move onto the next set > of discussions & issues. > > Jason > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jürgen Schönwälder > > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 1:55 AM > > To: Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> > > Cc: netmod@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [netmod] Poll on YANG Versioning NBC Approach > > > > > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking > > links or > > opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. > > > > > > > > I disagree with the poll. There are important teachnigal differences > > behind the two options that this polls tries to hide. > > > > Updating YANG 1 and YANG 1.1 means creating YANG 1' and YANG > > 1.1'. There is no way that a new versioning approach will be > > understood by existing YANG tooling. That's an illusion. > > > > /js > > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:39:39PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > WG, > > > > > > Please help the YANG-versioning effort move forward by participating in > > > the > > following poll: > > > > > > - https://notes.ietf.org/netmod-2023-sept-poll (Datatracker login > > > required) > > > > > > Kent and Lou > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > netmod mailing list > > > netmod@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > > > > > -- > > Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://constructor.university/> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://constructor.university/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
