On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 3:39 PM Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote:
> WG, > > Please help the YANG-versioning effort move forward by participating in > the following poll: > > - https://notes.ietf.org/netmod-2023-sept-poll (Datatracker login > required) > > The draft proposed to change many specific MUST and MUST NOT requirements to MAY ignore. It has been pointed out that the correct change would be SHOULD NOT and the use of MAY is inappropriate according to the definitions in RFC 2119. Yet the WG continues to propose that these rules in RFC 7950 are purely optional and can be ignored by any implementation that chooses to do so. Of course rules that affect backward compatibility and stability do not affect the code that compiles a module. They only affect the client code that attempts to use the unstable server code. Kent and Lou > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
