On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:23:59AM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote: > Notes > ----- > In Section 3, the textual definition of the "ietf-yang-types" module > presents, in my opinion, inconsistencies when defining typedefs that point to > other typedefs in the same module: sometimes the value for the "type" key > contains the prefix of the module and sometimes not. Please, see the example > attached. This can also be applied to other typedefs defined in the latest > revisions of the module, such as "date-no-zone" and "time-no-zone". I think > this should be addressed to provide clarification and consistency, and thus > can be extended to other modules and the YANG standard as well. Thanks for > your time. >
Using the prefix is perhaps redundant but surely not wrong. Which consistency are you looking for, use of prefixes only when absolutely necessary, or always use prefixes? /js -- Jürgen Schönwälder Constructor University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://constructor.university/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
