mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > Re-, > > There was an invitation to review the changes: > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/4NDzo7SLinue-CeHGRyOD6aWXHI/, > but no follow-up. > > Do you have any concern with that part? Thanks.
I do, but I suspect that there is a reason for this rule, so I'd like to understand that. (I have some faint memory of such a discussion on the list, but I may be wrong). My objection is (1) why should this legal construct not be used and (2) I don't think the proposed workaround is correct, since if you move the when to a container that surrounds the entire choice, the other cases in the choice are also made conditional. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
