Re-, Please see inline.
Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Martin Björklund <mbj+i...@4668.se> > Envoyé : vendredi 8 décembre 2023 17:35 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> > Cc : netmod@ietf.org > Objet : Re: [netmod] case + when in 8407bis > > mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > > Re-, > > > > There was an invitation to review the changes: > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmail > archive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fnetmod%2F4NDzo7SLinue- > CeHGRyOD6aWXHI%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cdeeb > 1242f9e74a43da5208dbf80baf06%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C > 0%7C638376501320001779%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJ > QIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=k4pc > 95TknbyhSk4duRn%2Brt6vlTPOchzrsVbFOiuYv4M%3D&reserved=0, but no > follow-up. > > > > Do you have any concern with that part? Thanks. > > I do, but I suspect that there is a reason for this rule, so I'd like > to understand that. (I have some faint memory of such a discussion on > the list, but I may be wrong). > > My objection is (1) why should this legal construct not be used and [Med] The reasoning is: What would be intuitive is to see a model use either of these approaches rather than both. This questions the need for the choice/case statement in the first place. > (2) I don't think the proposed workaround is correct, since if you > move the when to a container that surrounds the entire choice, the > other cases in the choice are also made conditional. [Med] Actually, that's not what the text intends to say. The proposal is to consider getting rid of choice. > > > > /martin ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
