On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:07 PM Kent Watsen <kent+i...@watsen.net> wrote:
> NETMOD, > > An IESG member reviewing one of my drafts flagged a section I had written > to satisfy this text from > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8407#section-3.5: > > If the document contains a YANG module(s) that is compliant with > NMDA > [RFC8342], then the Introduction section should mention this fact. > > Example: > > The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network > Management Datastore Architecture defined in RFC 8342. > > > What does "compliant with NMDA” actually mean? Are not all modules > “compliant”, even if they unnecessarily define some opstate nodes? > > I do not recall the discussions that led to that text. > Does this sentence actually point to if the document publishes any so > called “-state” modules, defined only to support legacy “non-NMDA” servers? > > I think the state modules are optional, so it is still unclear what NMDA conformance means for a YANG module. Does it make sense to clarify this text, since rfc8407bis is an open WG > document at the moment? > maybe it means to follow all the guidelines in 4.23.3 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8407#section-4.23.3 maybe remove this other text you cite. > Thanks, > Kent > > Andy > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
