Hello All, For those of you who were in person at IETF-121, hopefully you all had a safe travel back.
I would like to thank the group for the fruitful discussion on various proposals on templates. When reading the drafts further, i have few questions on the draft draft-ma-netmod-yang-config-template-00 - YANG Templates<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-netmod-yang-config-template/> . Since, it is marked as standards track, I would like to understand if the intention is to standardise the 'ietf-template' model mentioned in section 8.1 or to standardise the metadata object stmt-extend/operation-tag or both. In my view, the stmt-extend/operation-tag is something which could as well be achieved with existing RFC 7952? I have similar queries on slides-121-netmod-sessb-16-yang-templates-01<https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/121/materials/slides-121-netmod-sessb-16-yang-templates-01>, are we proposing to standardise the module 'yang-template' in slide 3 or the metadata object apply-templates/exclude-templates or both? In both the proposals, were the point on mandatories and defaults(which was touched upon in the meeting) considered? I believe, this needs to be considered when applying a template. Regards, Deepak
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
