H Shiya, > Consider a template that defines some interface data nodes using ietf > interfaces yang model. Leaf node “type” is a mandatory data node according to > RFC 8343. > +--rw interfaces > +--rw interface* [name] > +--rw name string > +--rw description? string > +--rw type identityref > > So even if you have defined the “type” of the interface in the templates, you > will be forced to set this at the reference point as well. Isn’t it?
Yes, the “type” leaf would have to be set, in <intended> after all templates have been fully expanded/flattened (disclaimer: this is my worldview) Is your worldview that templates need to be validated when defined, even if not used? (see https://github.com/netmod-wg/template-reqs/issues/4). If this is your view, then your example makes more sense. Kent
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
