Thanks Kent. To add to what Kent mentioned about the origins of the document, RFC8407bis is a BCP and was trying to update a Standards Document. As such, I asked the authors to split Section 5.2 out of RFC8407bis into its own short document that is on the Standards track.
It should be a short read. Cheers. > On May 14, 2025, at 2:50 PM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > This email begins a 1-week WGLC on: > > Update to YANG Module Names Registration > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020-iana-update > > If this draft seems unfamiliar to you, it is because it skipped the adoption > process and became a WG document yesterday. Please note that this document > extracts content from 8407bis, which is already submitted to IESG for > publication, and hence why Mahesh felt 1-week would be okay. > > Please send comments to the list by May 21. > > Kent // chair > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
