Hi Kent, > On May 14, 2025, at 2:57 PM, Kent Watsen <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi Med, > > If this document, in Section 3.1, moves > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-25#section-5.2 > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-25#section-5.2>, > how come it doesn't also move "the template necessary for registration in > Appendix B"?
Good point. rfc8407bis is in RFC Editor queue. I will ask them to hold the document to make the move. Another question to consider is, do we need to move Appendix C? Cheers. > > Also, where in rfc8407bis is Section 3.2 coming from? > > Kent // contributor > > >> On May 14, 2025, at 5:50 PM, Kent Watsen <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> This email begins a 1-week WGLC on: >> >> Update to YANG Module Names Registration >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020-iana-update >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020-iana-update> >> >> If this draft seems unfamiliar to you, it is because it skipped the adoption >> process and became a WG document yesterday. Please note that this document >> extracts content from 8407bis, which is already submitted to IESG for >> publication, and hence why Mahesh felt 1-week would be okay. >> >> Please send comments to the list by May 21. >> >> Kent // chair >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
