Hi Scott, Just one suggestion to address Reese’s comments. See inline with [mj]
> On Oct 12, 2025, at 5:46 AM, Scott Mansfield <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello, and thank you for the review! > > Please see my responses and suggested actions marked by <scott></scott> > in-line below. Let me know if the resolutions are acceptable, and I will > re-spin the draft. > > Regards and Thanks, > -scott. > > Snip... > > Minor issues: > > Section 9 (Security Considerations) has RFC AAAA, but I don't see where that > reference is defined. Please double-check that this reference is clear. > <scott> > This is from the Security Considerations template found in > draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis. I suggest that I simply take out the first > sentence of that section since draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis isn't an RFC yet. > Leave the rest of the section because the new template is easy to read and > use. > </scott> [mj] I would just refer to the I-D itself or add a “Note to the RFC Editor”. You can say - “This section is modeled after the template described in Section 3.7 of [I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis]” and let the editor insert the right RFC number when it is assigned (possibly before this document gets to publication state). Alternatively, you can add a “Note to the RFC Editor” and mention that AAAA should be the number that will be assigned to I-D.ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis. Thanks Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
