On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 04:59:31PM +0200, Alpt wrote: > Take a look at: > > http://www.reddit.com/info/6pvdp/ > > Feel free to contribute to the discussion.
Many comments are useless flamewar/trolling/etc. so I woudn't mind. On the other hand, a few of them IMHO got a point. Probably terms like "fractal" and "quantum" are best left alone, 'cause techie guys will see you are not actually talking of fractals and just think you have no idea what are you talking about and misusing other well-defined words. I once felt this way, when a friend of mine asked my opinion about some semiotic work that was using "fractals" and other mathematical concepts in a rather absurd way. I know this is not YOUR case, guys, but nerds out there do not. Last time I checked the docs there was no conjecture about performace of the algorithms used, but just a few examples with very few nodes, and I was actually curious myself about what would happen on a much larger scale. Hope I can find some spare time to contribute the project, but odds are I will not for a long time. (DAMN UNIVERSITY) :( My 0.02, eflags -- Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Copy me to your .signature file and help me propagate, thanks! _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
