On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:27 PM, eflags <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the other hand, a few of them IMHO got a point. Probably > terms like "fractal" and "quantum" are best left alone, 'cause > techie guys will see you are not actually talking of fractals and > just think you have no idea what are you talking about and > misusing other well-defined words.
I'll second that. Terminology like this tends to invite ridicule. Last time I checked the docs there was no conjecture about > performace of the algorithms used, but just a few examples with > very few nodes, and I was actually curious myself about what > would happen on a much larger scale. I'm pretty sure simulations have been ran with very high node counts with good results, and the simulation engine is in svn, so you can reproduce results.
_______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
