On 25/05/13 13:54, Ricardo Lanziano wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Yussi <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Basically, If i understand it right, once we have a VPN, any one of us > can open a tunnel and connect to it, and it'll form some basis for a > network. > > I actually have ntk running on several devices, one of which, my > raspberry pi, which I can keep online most of the time. The problem is, > I don't have anywhere to connect to. while it's nice to play around with > my own LAN, it's pretty pointless. > > I can set up the VPN on my end, the problem is, my IP changes every few > days, and so I cannot publish it. > > There are other ways too, I have a TOR hidden service address (which I > am not using), so we can in theory route over TOR, we can use CJDNS as > the basis for our infrastructure, or even I2P tunnels, but all of those > are kind of hacks, even a VPN is not ideal, but it's the best we can do > until we have enough people that can just connect to one another to form > a real network. > > Incidentally, I love I2P, and if someone will show me any evidence that > all the JAVA vulnerabilities do not effect it, I would love to go back > and use it, and I should have no problem using i2p tunnels for ntk. > > > I can help you with some I2P tunnels aswell. I do not have any "evidence" > whatsoever, other than one should keep the goddamn Java up-to-date :'D Sounds good. I still don't have I2P on my raspberry, just my desktop. I am upgrading everything now, and will restart it in a bit. I've been off the network for a few months now, so it might take me a while to reintegrate. Will report back in a couple of days.
> > There is a C++ port of I2P at http://projects.i2p but it is not fully > functional yet. > > If you want, we can try to set up some tunnels and hook up some services, > I have a machine I can spare in I2P. > > I rather use I2P than TOR (CJDNS is out of the question). LOL, is this a matter of pride? There are a lot of good people on cjdns, and it's not a bad idea. I don't think we should position ourselves against it, and when possible we should try and work together. > > > If someone has another idea about how we can kick start this network, > please throw them at the list so we can figure out what's the best way > forwards. > > > What about (not in particular order): > > 1. Get some nodes working and interconnected via Internet (darknets, etc) YES > 2. Get the wiki organized: documentation update, document consolidation > from all the different places, etc. YES > 3. Get people to review the theory. YES > 4. Actually *run* some services in the network. AND YES > > -- > Ricardo Lanziano > To iterate is human, to recurse, divine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Netsukuku mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku _______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
