On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Yussi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > There is a C++ port of I2P at http://projects.i2p but it is not fully > > functional yet. > > > > If you want, we can try to set up some tunnels and hook up some services, > > I have a machine I can spare in I2P. > > > > I rather use I2P than TOR (CJDNS is out of the question). > LOL, is this a matter of pride? There are a lot of good people on cjdns, > and it's not a bad idea. I don't think we should position ourselves > against it, and when possible we should try and work together. > No, of course not. My main problem with CJDNS is that is *not* a secure darknet because it is not anonymous, in contrast with I2P. I2P is an anonymous mixnet with networking layer *on top*. It vastly differs from CJDNS. In fact, you can't compare CJDNS to I2P. I2P builts unidirectional tunnels of n lenght that lasts 10 mins or so, and you need to build a tunnel for both receiving and sending data, that are always changing. You get a totally different return path for the same connection, ie: IRC, web, XMPP... I2P provides *anonymity*. CJDNS offers you a static path for your packets, since tunnels crosses for the same machines. The main idea of Netsukuku is that the network grows itselfs, free of censorship, control, and single-point of failure. So, yes, I think it's a bad idea if we want Netsukuku to grow in features and in research. I am not against CJDNS nor the people that runs in Hyperboria (an invite-only network iirc? ;) ) but in terms of features, related work and anonymity and censorship resistant mindset, I rather look at I2P. For example, taking real content authentication for the network: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.73.2699 -- Ricardo Lanziano To iterate is human, to recurse, divine.
_______________________________________________ Netsukuku mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netsukuku
