On Fri, 01 May 2009 12:12:16 +0100 R-Comp Interactive/RCI <[email protected]> wrote:
> In message <[email protected]> > you wrote: > > > On Fri, 01 May 2009 11:28:21 +0100 > > R-Comp Interactive/RCI <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Thankyou for your information. > > > Hi, > > > Can I take this as being that you will from this point on include > > written offers with the products that you sell? > > I believe that's what I said at the show! Right, I just wanted to make sure :) > Since there's a little space at the bottom of our printed welcome > guides, I see no reason not to repeat your kindly-provided (and > thankfully suscinct) paragraph there too :) Cool. > That said, under legal precedent (I was looking into this today for > some other business), we're already doing so, since "in writing" has > been extended to cover electronic text as well these days, so as long > as the written (ie. text) offer is included (which it always has > been), everything's hunkidory. Indeed; GPLv3 mops up the ambiguity, but has a bundle of other new problems. Most companies upon taking legal advice choose to include a physical written offer, because then there is no possible argument. And of course, legal precedents only apply in the jurisdictions they occur in. B.
