On Tue, 5 May 2009 17:30:49 +0100 (BST) Chris Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Don't worry; there is > > a trivial way to comply with the licence under which NetSurf was > > distributed to you, and the original mail details this. > > There doesn't seem to be copy of the relevant document on the copy of > A9home disc image we made at launch in 2006 (though we have no stock > at present so can't confirm the current status) What makes you think > it isn't there? Because it isn't there on either of the two I have access to, and a customer at the show said they don't recall it being there. > Cutting out the middle man should also help ensure that things get > done correctly first time. It also kills two birds with one stone as > presumably a copy of the email sent to Matt originally. Unfortunately, the middle man doesn't matter; you are obliged by the licence agreement that you received NetSurf under to provide the licence text and a written offer, as you are distributing it. Simply putting the licence text and the written offer on a bit of paper in the box is sufficient for this. (And actually keeping a copy of the source for three years, of course.) B.
