On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:25:42 +0000, John-Mark Bell wrote: > Additionally, Vince has suggested that we do a 2.5 release (once I've > fixed the cache!), which would be the stepping-off point for the RISC OS > build. I'm inclined to agree that this is sensible and, given the > current rate of progress on new-cache, I suspect it'd be around about > Wakefield by the time it's stabilised.
Sounds like a good idea. Has it been decided to drop RISC OS support then, or is this a case of anybody who wants to work on the RISC OS interface has until the show to get treeview working otherwise it gets axed? Chris
