Wait till you hear who else is getting their economic theory from an AI. The situation in the US grows more dire by the day, and just-add-water pseudo-analyses, whether AI-enabled or not, that invoke structural theories to encourage passivity on any level, practical or theoretical, should be challenged. If that’s “liberal dream,” fine.
Cheers, Ted On 4 Apr 2025, at 6:43, Dmytri Kleiner via nettime-l wrote: > This reeks of telling me to stfu, just like Byfields comments, while > continuing the trend, as DeepSeek pointed out, of misrepresentint the point > and sidesteping my core argumenents. > > I'm ok with a bit of humour on nettime, honestly, as well as critically > engaging with modern tech trends, including (*gasp*) LLMs, and trying to post > with style (at the risk of being cool, I know) > > I'm also ok with sticking to the point tho. > > It's telling that the core points remain unaddressed. No interest in the role > of profit, just telling me I'm one of those bad marxists who's mean and > crushes liberal dreams. > > Don't intend into be male, just noting what gets reproach and what doesn't. -- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: https://www.nettime.org # contact: [email protected]
