Yes thanks Florian- so interesting to read this mangling of Gramsci by Yiannopolous. The extraordinary images of him cavorting in a bath of pig’s blood in a scandalously naive (or simply cynical) NY Chelsea gallery, purportedly mourning the lives lost to Islamic fundementalism- he looked for all the world like a "bargain basement" Herman Nietzsche. This plumbed new depths of shock/kitch (is that a genre there days- looking at Yiannopolous’s erstwhile friend Lucien Wintrich photo series Twinks for Trump its beginning to look that way). Actually this hides the more serious development that Yiannopolous’s tactics have re-purposed the venerable Camp sensibility which he cleverly connects with Lulz, as sharing the ability to be shocking whilst simultaneously using their respective modes as solvents to neutralize moral indignation.
1. A couple of asides at the end of last year Wolfgang Streeck wrote a very interesting piece for London review of Books called ‘You Need a Gun’ which argued that Gramsci concept of hegemony could not be understood if it were seen to be coercion free- but that coercion takes many forms with violence as a background option always available if all else fails. Though there is much that there may be much that Bannon and the other Gramscian’s of the new American far right get wrong but this is one aspect they have understood quite well. 2. This is quite tenuous association but listening to your talk I thought of the English Marxist philosopher Peter Dews’s book -The Idea of Evil- interrogates a certain bias in history and political thought that ‘people who are pessiistic about human nature tend to be right wing, while left wing thinkers tend to be optimistic about human nature (in Dews’s view naively so) in a recent interview Dews declared that he wanted to disrupt this alignment.. Whilst listening to your talk in Berlin I wondered if there was something like an exploration of the affective consequences of such a re-alignment in your talk and the questions that this might ask of us. Best David On 10 Sep 2018, at 23:58, Florian Cramer <flrnc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, David - as I said in the discussion in Berlin, Stewart and I ended up > in a weird place where we practically taught the "Alt-Right" its own history. > One shouldn't read too much into its grasp of Gramsci though. This is what > Milo > Yiannopolous wrote about him in the original manuscript of his book > 'Dangerous' (that Simon & Schuster ended up not publishing): > And so, in the 1920s, the Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci decided that the > time had come for a new form of revolution -- one based on culture, not > class. According to Gramsci, the reason why the proletariat had failed to > rise up was because old, conservative ideas like loyalty to one's country, > family values, and religion held too much sway in working-class communities. > If that sounds familiar to Obama's comment about guns and religion, that's > because it should. His line of thinking, as we shall see, is directly > descended from the ideological tradition of Gramsci. Gramsci argued that as a > precursor to revolution, the old traditions of the west -- or the 'cultural > hegemony,' as he called it -- would have to be systematically broken down. To > do so, Gramsci argued that "proletarian" intellectuals should seek to > challenge the dominance of traditionalism in education and the media, and > create a new revolutionary culture. Gramsci's ideas would prove phenomenally > influential. If you've ever wondered why forced to take diversity or gender > studies courses at university, or why your professors all seem to hate > western civilization ... Well ' ..new you knew who to blame Gramsci. > (Because of the lawsuit, the manuscript is publicly available here: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/bjc0n5dll244o2w/Milo%20Y%20book%20with%20edits.pdf?dl=0 > ) > -F > -- > blog: https://pod.thing.org/people/13a6057015b90136f896525400cd8561 > bio: http://floriancramer.nl > # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission > # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org > # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
