Retreating into a dead language is the most idiotic thing I've heard in a
while - unless this is a symbolic parody of how isolated much of the
academic humanities is. Why not just stick w the outdated 1970s critical
theory that everyone already regularly invokes?

Garnet Hertz


On Sun, Nov 10, 2019, 11:44 AM Iain Boal <b...@sonic.net> wrote:

> Eheu Sean,
>
> As you say, 'Obscurity, especially in latin, is not a guarantee of
> anything.’  A training in Latin used to be regarded as a portal to the
> full resources of the English language, which is in effect a post-1066
> Anglo-Norman creole.  Historically this involved a training in “classics”
> (no accident that “classics” is cognate with “class”) and typically
> correlated with a privileged education.
>
> The Welsh critic and *tribunus plebis* Raymond Williams grappled head-on
> with the problem of English as a two-tiered diglossia. (He was looking in
> at English from the outside, approaching the language as a native Welsh
> speaker.) He saw clearly the problems produced by a language with class
> inscribed so deeply in the structure, and for that reason he suggested a
> regular column in the *Tribune* newspaper on 'difficult' words,
> especially those with polysyllabic Greek and Latin roots. The editors
> turned the proposal down, and so Williams published *Keywords*, never
> having had the chance to take on, in the pages of *Tribune*, what he
> thought was the disastrous policy of George Orwell, who had suggested that
> proletarians (or ‘nobodies’, in Morlock’s formula) stick to simple
> Anglo-Saxon monosyllables, more honest and less liable to fall into
> Stalinist obscurantism and gobbledegook. Williams considered this strategy
> a bogus and condescending populism that was all too easy a recommendation
> coming from the dissident Etonian and classical scholar Eric Blair.
> Ironically, learning Latin was, for Williams, a means to the precise
> antithesis of Morlock’s conceited proposal.
>
> Iain
>
>
> On 10 Nov 2019, at 07:14, Sean Cubitt <s.cub...@gold.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Eheu Morlock
>
> sadly you picked the wrong language: the UK premiere B Johnson has made a
> habit of adding latin tags to his outrageous posh-boy persona behind which
> hides a refusal to publish a budget, the official financial predictions for
> Brexit, the results of an enquiry into alleged financial impropriety and
> the results of a major enquiry into Russian interference and donations to
> his party. Obscurity, especially in latin, is not a gurantee of anything
>
> perhaps ancient Greek . . .
>
> Sean Cubitt
> Goldsmiths, University of London
> (U of Melbourne from Jan 2020)
> ------------------------------
> *From:* nettime-l-boun...@mail.kein.org <nettime-l-boun...@mail.kein.org>
> on behalf of nettime-l-requ...@mail.kein.org <
> nettime-l-requ...@mail.kein.org>
> *Sent:* 10 November 2019 11:00
> *To:* nettime-l@mail.kein.org <nettime-l@mail.kein.org>
> *Subject:* nettime-l Digest, Vol 146, Issue 17
>
> Send nettime-l mailing list submissions to
>         nettime-l@mail.kein.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         nettime-l-requ...@mail.kein.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         nettime-l-ow...@mail.kein.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of nettime-l digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Latin as revolutionary act? (Morlock Elloi)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 14:48:36 -0800
> From: Morlock Elloi <morlockel...@gmail.com>
> To: nettime-l@mail.kein.org
> Subject: <nettime> Latin as revolutionary act?
> Message-ID: <5dc74244.8090...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> What would be consequences of using Latin language among
> group/clique/cabal/underground/elite for discourse, publishing, idea
> exchange, tweets? (let's ignore for the moment how does one get the
> above set to learn Latin)
>
> First of all, the noise goes down, as there is intellectual effort
> barrier involved. Feeble-minded, distracted, low IQ, vacuous, and other
> nobodies are out. It would be like early Internet (1990s) - only nice
> and interesting people, no rabble. Only more resilient, because the
> 'price' of learning tongue will never go down, unlike computer equipment
> and access.
>
> Second, the cross-pollution from deluge of mechanically augmented media
> firehoses goes way down. Language is the medium, and, of course, the
> medium is the message. It's much harder to influence those thinking in a
> foreign tongue.
>
> Third, the isolated hermetic nature of such setup would allow thinking
> to mature, being spared from cretinous cheering and booing from the
> unwashed crowd. At the same time, it can use modern networking
> technology to attract interest globally.
>
>
> Perdidi unum in mediis soccus lauandi, et iam sentire perfecta!
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
>
> End of nettime-l Digest, Vol 146, Issue 17
> ******************************************
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
>
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
> #  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
#  @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:

Reply via email to