please (Daniel Ross), define "absolute failure (of the West)".
-a
ps: i suggest to leave room, in this definition, for failures of yet
other proportions.
pps: looks like adjectives are generally up for grabs these days and
might become redundant rubble, if not signifiers of the opposites, like
"precise(ly)" in many philosophical discourses.
Am 02.09.21 um 23:44 schrieb Sean Cubitt:
thanks for circulating Patrice
there's a great piece responding to similar issues byDaniel Ross (aka
Stiegler’s translator):
https://mscp.org.au/plague-proportions/this-pandemic-should-not-have-happened
<https://mscp.org.au/plague-proportions/this-pandemic-should-not-have-happened>
a flavour:
"Anthropogenic climate change and the systemic limits with which it is
associated indeed define the fundamental emergency situation with which
we are confronted today. The possibility of facing up to this emergency
depends on recognizing that this accident must become our necessity, a
necessity whose impure technological, but also social, economic and
political conditions are alone what make possible the exercise of
collective intelligence, belief, wisdom and decision. The temptation is
always to say that freedom and democracy are the fundamental
requirements for making good collective decisions, and yet the
/absolute/ failure of the West over the past two years means that these
ideas must /absolutely/ be subjected to critique, where the latter is
/never/ a denunciation, but an interrogation of their ‘pharmacological’
limits"
seán
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
# @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: