in-line :- On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 15:05, Raj Mathur<[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not particularly in favour of public domain either, since that > waives all rights. Something that retains the freedom to do as you > please with the content without letting anyone proprietarise it (e.g. > CC-BY-SA) may be more appropriate. Agreed that there must be clear > overall licence for content posted to the list, though, and not > individual licences on individual mail messages (which may even be > technically meaningless, since as a recipient I have to agree to a > licence before I receive the material, not after the material is already > with me -- retroactive conditions like "By reading this mail you agree > to feed me pizza" don't work in any communications setup). So you want the list to have a particular way of defining rights which works best to your interest. I would be particularly interested to know why CC-SA and not CC-SA-A if we are talking about the CC licenses. > Regards, > > -- Raj > -- > Raj Mathur [email protected] http://kandalaya.org/ > GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F > PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves <snip> -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
