On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 09:08, tb dinesh<[email protected]> wrote: <snip>
> Right, as in many of the confidentiality disclaimers in corporate > emails that end with some claimer that says something like: > > if this mail was not meant for you (and you have > read it in spite, haven't you?), you will loose your pizzaz. > > Ha ha > > Indeed. Ha ha. Are you saying that corporates should not have such disclaimers in their communication. Some websites say otherwise. http://www.techsoup.org/learningcenter/internet/page10429.cfm http://www.emaildisclaimers.com/ http://www.busmanagement.com/article/E-mail-privacy-compliance-where-do-you-stand/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_block#Email_signatures_in_business I would be interested to know if servelots (as an e.g.) has published its stand on e-mail and online communications somewhere on its website. (I have failed to find something therein . ) <strong> for the sake of argument </strong> let's say I agree that for mailing lists per-se there should be no such disclaimers. Do you know of any such tool where one can have filter saying if I'm sending mail to so & so mailing list please do not add my signature to the same ? Then is such a service also available with webmail vendors as well ? I, as a user is not willing to go to take a huge performance penalty/hit which serves me no purpose. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
