On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 09:55, ck raju <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:28 AM, vid <[email protected]> wrote: >> I have a doubt : Is it not possible for the floss-code-writer to use >> parts of his GPL code in a proprietary software when s/he may not >> distribute the binaries??
s/his/their > > Is telling other "no one should control others.." a kind of control ? > Is this *control* the same as the control others exhibit - think its a > debate for sake of debating... Ah..., while its tempting to digress, i'd like to draw attention to JTD's quote[0] : "Clarification: All FLOSS code is proprietary - someone owns the copyright and hence it is proprietary. Ownership of copyright is a prerequisite for enforcing the GPL." /quote ; which was the premise of my question. [0] http://lists.fosscom.in/pipermail/network-fosscom.in/2009-September/001348.html -- vid http://vid.svaksha.com || _______________________________________________ network mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fosscom.in/listinfo.cgi/network-fosscom.in
