On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 15:48 +0800, Cathy Zhou wrote: > Understood. Specific for this case, I will let Seb decide whether/how to > provide the backwards bfu support for MAC-type plugin bits.
I don't see how it will be possible to make backward bfu work in this case unless we want to forever entrench the construct aggr0/<key> into the configuration file syntax as opposed to the proposed aggr<key>. If someone can come up with an idea, please let me know. -Seb _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
