> Whilst I didn't have multiple MAC addresses in mind, my concern > is that the "set" should be called in the same way as "get", even if > there is (currently) only a single parameter that works with "set". > Maybe in the future there will be a DLPI mechanism to change the > factory address or there will be a 3rd setting...who knows? If we > are opening up get like this, it stands to reason we should make > some plans for set as well.
I agree that seems reasonable, and makes the APIs more symmetric. -- meem _______________________________________________ networking-discuss mailing list [email protected]
