On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 06:00:31PM -0500, Peter Memishian wrote:
> 
> David and Renee,
> 
> To make your jobs easier, I've built an alternate webrev that shows just
> the changes to ath(7D) from the version that Venu reviewed earlier:
> 
>     http://cr.grommit.com/~meem/wifi-1018-diff
> 
> This reduces the amount of change that needs review to 382 lines.  If you
> could review this ASAP, we would be quite grateful :-)

Many thanks for the alternate webrev!  My comments are below.

Apologies for the slow response...again.

-renee


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               FEEDBACK ON TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION/CODE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reviewer Name:  Renee Danson

Document/Module Title:  wifi-1018-diff

Document/Module Version/Date:  11/10/06

No comments:
usr/src/uts/common/io/ath/ath_impl.h

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
usr/src/uts/common/io/ath/ath_aux.c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RD-17   289-290         Cos     You should be able to merge these two lines.

RD-18   298-299         Com     I'm puzzled by the if conditional and the
                                comment; they don't seem to match.  And I can't
                                find the implementation of ath_hal_mhz2ieee to
                                figure out what ix really is.  This is probably
                                okay, I'm just confused; but I'd like to
                                understand it!

RD-19   704             Cos     Typo: "reseting" should be "resetting"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
usr/src/uts/common/io/ath/ath_hal.h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RD-20   108             Com     typo: "interference used for as AR..." Probably
                                need to delete the 'as'.

RD-21   265             Com     The comment for this line is a dup of that on
                                the line above; I don't think that's right.

RD-22   279-280         Func    Just to be sure: it's intentional that the
                                first two items in the enum are set to 0x0001?

RD-23   320-322         Com     I don't understand the second sentence of this
                                comment; the word 'no' seems misplaced, but I
                                can't quite figure out how it should read.

RD-24   335-336         Com     There's an extra 'to' in there.

RD-25   528, 529        Com     The comments for these two lines seem to be
                                swapped.

RD-26   760, 761        Com     You didn't change this, but the comments for
                                these two lines seem to be swapped, as well.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
usr/src/uts/common/io/ath/ath_main.c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RD-27   1133            Com     typo: "descariptor" should be "descriptor"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment type key:
        Func    comment on functionality
        Perf    comment on performance
        CodeStd comment on coding standards
        Design  comment on design
        Edit    editorial comment
        Cos     cosmetic comment
        Com     comment on missing comments

_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to