aric wrote:
>> --On December 4, 2009 7:35:57 AM -0500 James 
>> Carlson<[email protected]> wrote:
> [snip]
>>  It may be ossible to hack the system so that it "ignores" the
>> conflicts ("set arp:arp_no_defense = 1" in /etc/system may do it),
>> but then you're just a sitting duck. 
> 
> Interestingly, I did do this on build 121 and left it running for the last 7 
> days. I have since updated to build 129 where this hack is NOT in place, and 
> I am now receiving an IP address. The same that I was assigned when I put 
> this hack into /etc/system last week on build 121. 
> 
> I suspect that somehow the arp table got messed up on my machine and changing 
> /etc/system temporarily fixed the problem. I wonder if arp -d would have been 
> sufficient?

Having the ARP table messed up on your machine wouldn't cause the
symptoms you described.

However, having someone else's ARP table somewhere on your local network
messed up -- such that it answers for the IP address that you're being
assigned -- would explain the problem.

I still think you've got either a broken piece of equipment on that
network, or perhaps a DHCP server that has bugs.  It's good to hear that
it's working for you now, but I wouldn't be surprised to find that you
come back later with more trouble.

-- 
James Carlson         42.703N 71.076W         <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
networking-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to